jump to navigation

A humanist iconography? January 4, 2009

Posted by Damian in Church and Christian History, Eastern Orthodoxy.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
trackback

I listened to an advent audio essay on BBC radio 4 show ‘A Point of View‘ by atheist Clive James. Its well worth listening to (it can be listened to here and downloaded here, although I don’t know how long for), but at one point he mentioned the transition from iconography to true-to-life:

When the early painters of the renaissance began painting religious figures as people rather than icons a new kind of belief had begun. The centre of attention was switching from the next world to this one, according to the revolutionary conviction that the life that really matters, happens between birth and death.

I’m no art historian, nor do I know much about iconography. To be honest, I haven’t even read up on it, except online. Try However, I’m very interested in it – check out Richard Beck’s series on the theology of icons, and to me, just as Mr James said, the change in artistic expression of belief seems to be symbolic of a change in the beliefs themselves.

Perhaps this was the emergence of humanism as Mr James suggests, or the emergence of Protestantism, or a combination of both. Regardless, it seems to be representative of the rise of two major players in the spiritual zeitgeist of our age – individualism and hedonism.

The Protestant in me protests that individualism could ever be a bad thing. And the creationist in me protests that hedonism is bad. I would probably be characterised, in some ways, as a Christian hedonist (according to John Piper, anyway), although I don’t usually like the label. I certainly take delight in creation, and it seems to me that creation is there to be delighted in.

But, in all things, moderation. I think the mysticism, spiritual consciousness and group awareness reflected in iconography must be tempered with the awareness of the individual, consciousness of the physical, and missional focus that is inherent in humanist portrayals of faith.

We are, after all, both individuals and communities, both physical and spiritual, called to invite God both inside ourselves and invite him out into the larger world. If I were an artist, I think I would attempt to express this: a humanist iconography.

Comments»

1. Josh - January 7, 2009

Just as a point of clarification, though, the early renaissance religious painting is not monolithically iconography.

Also, referring to icons as “artistic expression” might get you in trouble with some of our Orthodox friends. Just a heads up.

Regardless, these are some interesting thoughts.

2. Damian - January 7, 2009

Thanks, Josh. You’re right that renaissance religious painting is not iconography – I didn’t mean to suggest that it was. And you’re right that ‘artistic expression’ mightn’t be the best way to describe iconography, but truth is that it is art expressing theology, so I don’t think it’s invalid. If there are Orthodox reading this post (and I believe a few do), then I would love them to explain their problem with the phrase.